Артур
Юрист по вопросам миграции
Business and Visas in Kazakhstan: Legal Advice and Practice

AIFC vs. Kazakhstan LLP in 2026: Which Structure Actually Fits Your Business

Company setup
A structured comparison of AIFC and Kazakhstan LLP in 2026
AIFC is marketed as "Kazakhstan's Dubai" — 0% corporate tax, English common law, zero currency controls for AIFC participants. For half the use cases it's overkill. For the other half it's the only serious option. The deciding factor is rarely the headline tax rate — it's what the business actually does day to day.
Four real scenarios from 2026 show when AIFC wins, when an LLP wins, and where founders typically guess wrong.
Короткий ответ:
  • AIFC (Astana International Financial Centre) is a special jurisdiction inside Kazakhstan with common-law-based AIFC Court, Acts-based regulation, and tax exemptions for registered participants.
  • LLP (ТОО) is a Kazakhstan national-law company — cheaper to set up, faster, wider bank access, more suitable for physical trade and standard services.
  • Tax: AIFC participants — 0% CIT on qualifying financial activities until 2066, 0% personal income tax for AIFC employees' KZ-source income from AIFC employer. LLP: 10% SNR or 20% general CIT.
  • Registration: LLP — 1-3 business days, ≈$500-1,800 total. AIFC — 3-6 weeks, $1,500-7,000+ depending on activity and AFSA approval.
  • AIFC wins for: fintech, investment funds, holdings, SPVs, IP boxes, asset management, family offices, insurance & reinsurance, Islamic finance.
  • LLP wins for: trading, e-commerce, dev shops, manufacturing, services to local clients, standard SME operations.
FeatureAIFC CompanyKazakhstan LLP
Legal systemAIFC Acts (common-law-based)Civil Code of Kazakhstan
CourtAIFC Court (English-language)Kazakh national courts
Language of corporate docsEnglish primaryKazakh / Russian
CIT0% on qualifying activities until 206610% SNR / 20% standard
PIT on KZ-source employment income0% for AIFC-employed staff10%
VATExempt for qualifying activities12% above threshold
FX controlsFully exemptKazakh FX control applies
Min share capitalFrom $1,000 (most forms)From 1 KZT
Setup timeline3-6 weeks1-3 business days
Setup cost$1,500-7,000+$500-1,800
Office requirementPhysical office in AIFCLegal address (service OK)
RegistryAFSA Public RegisterState company registry
Visa track for foundersAIFC residency (separate)Standard work/investor visa
A founder runs a RegTech SaaS billing €800k/year to European financial institutions. No local Kazakh clients. Wants a KZ base for engineering, with a licensable structure.
AIFC:
  • 0% CIT on revenue (non-resident qualifying clients).
  • 0% PIT on AIFC-employed KZ-based engineers (~15 people).
  • English common law governs contracts; familiar to EU clients.
  • No FX controls — EUR revenue flows freely.
LLP:
  • 10-20% CIT; 10% PIT on staff.
  • Kazakh civil law — requires additional side-letter mechanics for EU clients.
Annual tax delta at €800k revenue, 30% margin ($240k profit): AIFC — $0 CIT. LLP SNR (if eligible) — $24,000. LLP general — $48,000. Plus PIT delta of ~$20,000 on staff salaries. AIFC setup cost (~$5,000) pays back in month 1.
Winner: AIFC.
A Turkish family-owned group wants a holding structure for subsidiaries in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Georgia. Looking for a jurisdiction with DTAs, IP-box potential, clean exit mechanics.
AIFC:
  • Pass-through dividend treatment for qualifying holdings.
  • Common law for shareholder agreements and intellectual property licensing.
  • Favourable exit mechanics (English law share purchase agreements).
  • AIFC IP Box regime available.
LLP:
  • Workable but Civil Code rigidities around share transfers, pre-emption rights.
  • Less familiar to foreign M&A counterparties.
Winner: AIFC.
A fund manager launching a $30M tech-focused fund targeting CIS startups.
AIFC:
  • AFSA-regulated fund vehicle.
  • AIFC Collective Investment Scheme rules — international investor comfort.
  • 0% CIT for the fund and the manager.
  • GP/LP structures available.
LLP:
  • Kazakh investment fund regulation applies — narrower, less flexible.
  • LP investors from outside CIS — significant legal explanation overhead.
Winner: AIFC.
A founder imports electronics from China, sells via Kaspi.kz and Wildberries to Kazakh consumers. Annual revenue 200M KZT.
LLP:
  • SNR regime: 10% CIT on revenue (or similar depending on sub-regime).
  • Full national banking access — Kaspi Pay integration, Halyk pos terminals.
  • Standard KZ tax returns — no AFSA overhead.
  • Bank processes rubles and yuan easily.
AIFC:
  • Not eligible for 0% CIT — this is a trading activity serving Kazakh residents.
  • Taxed at standard rates anyway.
  • AIFC office rent 3-5× standard Almaty commercial rent.
  • AFSA substance obligations, even as a non-regulated participant.
Winner: LLP.
A construction engineering firm, 40 engineers, serving KazMunayGas, Kazatomprom and municipal projects.
LLP:
  • Participates in Kazakh public tenders (requires local supplier status).
  • Standard invoicing, Russian/Kazakh.
  • Integrates with Kazakh chamber of commerce and ОЭЗ programmes.
AIFC:
  • Cannot compete on local tenders on the same footing.
  • Local content certification (СТ-KZ) is tied to national LLPs.
Winner: LLP.
Software studio, 8 engineers, billing $50k-100k/month to European corporate clients.
This is the borderline case.
LLP SNR:
  • 10% CIT; 10% PIT on staff.
  • Fast setup, simple reporting.
  • No substance test.
  • Staff on KZ IIN, easy to hire locally.
AIFC:
  • 0% CIT, 0% PIT.
  • Setup $3,000-5,000; higher annual compliance cost ~$5,000-10,000/year.
  • Substance requirement — real office in AIFC Astana.
  • Fewer banks, but international-friendly.
Break-even analysis at 30% net margin, $900k annual revenue ($270k profit): AIFC: $0 CIT + $10k annual compliance = $10k. LLP SNR: $27k CIT.
Delta: $17k/year in favour of AIFC, not counting PIT. AIFC pays back, but the annual compliance burden is material and you must run a real Astana office.
Winner depends on:
  • If staff is already in Astana / happy to be: AIFC.
  • If staff distributed across Kazakhstan: LLP.
Assume the same $900k revenue / $270k profit firm.
YearAIFC total tax+complianceLLP SNR total tax+compliance
Year 1$5,000 setup + $10,000 = $15,000$1,500 setup + $27,000 = $28,500
Year 2$10,000$27,000
Year 3$10,000$27,000
3-year total$35,000$82,500
AIFC saves ~$47,500 over 3 years in this scenario. Below ~$400k annual revenue the gap narrows sharply; below ~$200k profit annually, LLP SNR usually wins.
  1. Are clients mostly non-residents? → AIFC leans yes; LLP leans no.
  2. Is the activity financial / IT / IP / holding? → AIFC-eligible.
  3. Is the activity physical trade or service to KZ market? → LLP.
  4. Does the business need to pitch to EU/US funds or M&A counterparties? → AIFC's English-law story matters.
  5. Will you fight tax at margins or hate state forms in Russian? → AIFC.
  6. Will you outgrow SNR within 12 months? → AIFC-eligible activity becomes more compelling.
  7. Do you need KZ state tenders access? → LLP.
  • Compare the two structures for your specific business model on a spreadsheet: tax, compliance, exit mechanics, substance cost.
  • Map which AFSA / non-AFSA AIFC status fits (Ancillary Services vs Authorised Firm).
  • Set up the chosen structure end-to-end — registration, banking, substance, tax regime choice.
  • Support ongoing compliance — both AIFC and national.

Is AIFC's 0% CIT unconditional?

No. The 0% CIT applies to 'qualifying activities' listed in the AIFC Acts — primarily financial services, capital markets activities, asset management, Islamic finance, reinsurance, IT/fintech services provided by AIFC participants to AIFC participants or to non-residents. Provision of general services to the Kazakh national market is taxed at standard rates. Always review the activity list before assuming tax exemption applies.

Can an AIFC company have non-resident clients only?

Yes. AIFC does not require a local client base. Many AIFC companies are set up as holdings, SPVs, or regional hubs serving EU/US/Asia markets. Revenue from non-residents is generally qualifying for CIT purposes (subject to the activity test).

Does an AIFC company need a physical office in the AIFC?

Yes — a registered office at the AIFC is a licensing requirement. AFSA (AIFC financial regulator) checks for substance: real directors, real operations, meeting rooms, staff. Pure shell setups don't pass substance review. Substance requirements are scaled to activity — a family office may need less than a brokerage.

What currency controls apply to AIFC companies?

AIFC participants are exempt from Kazakhstan's currency control rules — free FX transactions, no mandatory conversion, no contract registration with the bank for FX operations. This is one of AIFC's strongest practical advantages. Note: it applies to the AIFC participant itself, not its counterparties.

Can I convert an LLP into an AIFC company later?

Not directly. You can set up a new AIFC company and transfer the business, assets, or intellectual property into it — this is a restructuring project with tax and contractual implications. Plan the jurisdiction at the outset if AIFC is likely.

What is AFSA?

AFSA — AIFC Financial Services Authority. It's the AIFC's regulator. All licensed financial activities in the AIFC require AFSA authorization. AFSA's standards are modeled on international best practice (DFSA/FCA-adjacent). For non-financial AIFC companies (e.g. holdings), AFSA involvement is minimal; for regulated activities (brokerage, fund management, banking), AFSA is the main gatekeeper.

How does staff taxation differ?

For AIFC employees of AIFC participants, employment income from the AIFC employer is exempt from personal income tax until 2066 — on Kazakhstan-source income in scope. For LLP employees — standard 10% PIT. This is relevant for senior hires: a $200k expat package in the AIFC is materially more tax-efficient.

Choosing between an AIFC company and a Kazakhstan LLP? Submit a case review — we'll compare the two options against your exact business model, tax profile, and operations. Request a case review →